Ronaldinho Gets an ‘F’ in Physics

In an ad for the new football shoes made after Ronaldinho, something that defies the laws of physics happens. Ronaldinho purposely kicks the ball into the post of the goal in order for it to come back to him. He does it a few times. He does it so easily. I have never in my time of watching soccer all my life seen such incredible accuracy. I am truely amazed.
Some of you might say that the ad was probably computerized in some way, but it isn’t. Articles have been written about this ad and aparently Nike says that all ads of this new Ronaldinho shoe were made up of raw footage of Ronaldinho, the shoes, and a ball.
Download: Ronaldinho Ping Pong (34.7 MB)
Here are the rest of the ads:
Ronaldinho Joca Bola (18.8 MB)
Ronaldinho Control (9.3 MB)
Ronaldinho Dribble (5.6 MB)
All videos were downloaded from Nike Football.
*These videos are huge because I kept them in their original HD quality.
**If only players of our national team were half Brazilian.


November 19th, 2005 at 11:05 am
Mad skizillz.
November 19th, 2005 at 12:18 pm
totally

william plz tell me, are the videos streaming??
my friends are telling me only the sound is streaming without video
im guessing u downloaded it?
November 20th, 2005 at 8:11 am
eee only the sound is streaming!!
November 20th, 2005 at 10:33 am
craaaaaap
i worked so hard on encoding them :’(
March 17th, 2006 at 3:27 am
[...] Liked these? Then check out a similar post of mine: Ronaldinho Gets an ‘F’ in Physics. [...]
March 28th, 2006 at 3:10 pm
Mashkoora ya kashkoosha for these too! ;p
March 28th, 2006 at 5:22 pm
no probz
April 8th, 2006 at 8:12 pm
[...] Liked these? Then check out similar posts of mine: JogaTV Ronaldinho Gets an ‘F’ in Physics [...]
April 10th, 2006 at 6:24 pm
have u guys heard about the soccer player in garland texas named ricardo mendez thats gonna sign with manchester united for 500 million dollars they say hes way better than ronaldhino INCREDIBLE
April 10th, 2006 at 8:19 pm
better than ronaldinho?? do u have any videos or something to prove that?
thanks